Corrosion Protection of Materials

Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Corrosion-Active Non-Metallic Inclusions in Steels

Keywords

steel, corrosion-active non-metallic inclusions, structure, dissolution, fracture, fractographic analysis

Abstract

A critical analysis of the literature regarding methodological approaches for analyzing the number and chemical composition of corrosion-active non-metallic inclusions (CANI) in metals has been carried out. The advantages and disadvantages of the metallographic method (ASTM E45), chemical and electrochemical dissolution of the matrix, and studies using SKPFM, SEM, or TEM microscopy are highlighted. Fracture surfaces of steels 20, 40Kh, U8, and 38KhN3MFA were obtained by tensile and impact testing; fractographic studies, and chemical and quantitative analyses of CANI were performed. It is shown that when inclusions are studied using the metallographic method, small-sized inclusions are not accounted for, and their chemical composition is distorted, as in the case of chemical and electrochemical approaches, since particles interact with processing media. During fractographic evaluation of CANI and their chemical composition, the analysis is carried out on an almost juvenile surface. EDX analysis of particles reflects their real chemical composition. Since cracks formed on the fracture surface propagate through stress concentrators (CANI), the fracture visualizes the maximum concentration of inclusions.

References

  1. Costa e Silva, A.L.V. Non-metallic inclusions in steels – origin and control // Journal of Materials Research and Technology. – 2018. – 7(3). – P. 283–299.
  2. Brisenmark, J., & Jönsson Valencik, L. Evaluation of the Effect of Non-Metallic Inclusions on the Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Nickel-based Alloys //Bachelor Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. – 2020. – P.28
  3. Park, J., & Kang, C.Y. Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Non-Metallic Inclusions in High-Cleanliness Steels // Metals. – 2017. – 7(11) . – P. 465.
  4. Patel, D., Gupta, V., & Bajpai, S. Study of the Non-Metallic Inclusions and Their Effect on the Properties of Steel // In: Proc. of International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering & Technology (ICASPCT-2016), Raigarh, India. – 2016.
  5. Costa e Silva, A.L.V. Challenges and developments in the control of non-metallic inclusions in steel // Materials Research. – 2019. – 22(Suppl. 1). –
  6. Standard Test Methods for Determining the Inclusion Content of Steel // Deepak Patel et al. – 2016 https://store.astm.org/e0045-18a.html
  7. Method for fractographic diagnostics of steel contamination by corrosion-active non-metallic inclusions: Patent 135837 Ukraine / Krechkovska H.V., Vynar V.A., Student O.Z., Khoma M.S., Nykyforchyn H.M. // No. u2019 00243. – filed 19.01.2019. – pub. 25.07.2019. – Bulletin №14 – P.8.
  8. Shtayura S., Kostiv R., Vergun I., Shtayura O. Influence of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of 65G steel // Physico-Chemical Mechanics of Materials. – 2012. – Spec. Iss. 9. – Vol. 1. – 159–163.
  9. DSTU ISO 148-1:2022 Metallic materials – Charpy impact bending test on a pendulum impactor – Part 1: Test method (ISO 148-1:2016, IDT) https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=97169
  10. Khoma, M.S., Vynar, V.A., Chornyi, O.V., Maksishko, Yu., Ivashkiv, V.R., & Rats’ka, N.B. New Type of Corrosion-Active Nonmetallic Inclusions and their Influence on the Corrosion of 38KhN3MFA Steel // Materials Science. – 2020. – 55(5). – P.617–624.